Gamer (2012)








Through the Computer Monitor and Back
A Review of Oleg Sentsov's Gaamer (Gamer)

You are alone. Everything you see is strange, definitely not of the world where you were born and raised. Your forearms and your hands, the only parts of your body you can see, are curiously muscular, wrapped in space age protection, and brandishing a rifle-like mechanism. You run into a corridor. Running is easy, so you attempt to jump, as soon as the corridor ends to reveal an empty space. The world you’re in definitely does not follow Earth gravity, since your jump was higher than normal. You land straight in the middle of the space.

Your few seconds of peculiar inactivity in the middle of the empty space is interrupted by a quick yet ominous buzzing sound. You got hit. It didn’t hurt but the red gauge floating on the upper left corner of your field of vision shows that it had a significant damage to your life. You turn around and see the perpetrator, wearing a purple suit of futuristic armor, charging towards you. You fire your weapon, and after moments of sparks and noise, body parts erupt from where your opponent used to be. You let out a sigh of relief. A few seconds later however, the familiar ominous buzzing sound makes another appearance. You got hit again, and as always, it did not hurt. The only difference now is that that is the last time you’ll ever get hit, at least during that insignificant painless life that only lasted for a minute and a few seconds.

Videogames have really changed. From the pixelated single player adventures that had definite storylines to finish, games are now designed to be immersive and addictive, complete with manufactured visuals that are close to reality and a certain capacity for socialization. Videogames have not only created worlds, they have created lives that are as replaceable as ammo, leading to world rules that do away with morality and the sanctity of things that are normally sacred in the real world. Videogames have allowed us to live second lives that are presided over by the very simple law of kill or be killed. However, these secret second lives, lived only inside wired bedrooms or paid game hubs, are but mutations of the uneventful and painful real lives that gave way to them. The distances between these lives are short. But to travel back and forth, unmindful of the repercussions of being sucked into the seductive delights of a life with hardly any rules and complexities, poses an inherent danger.

Oleg Sentsov’s Gaamer explores the gap between these two lives. Through the story of young Koss (Vladislav Zhuk), who has just been expelled from vocation school but is unaffected because he believes he has a future in gaming, Sentsov paints a portrait of a very mundane life that struggles for some sort of significance. The nameless Ukrainian town that finds itself as the setting for Koss’ unremarkable coming-of-age offers no opportunity for excitement. The commuter tram plies its daily route with the same ticket lady inspecting if each passenger has paid their fare. The youth are on the verge of crossing over to adulthood, choosing which particular path would lead them to satisfy their responsibilities with the most ease. Most of them talk about college or work or fulfilling an ambition leftover from an unaccomplished childhood. They wilt away, thawing towards university, or some hobby, or some vocation. All in all, it is a town that aspires for character. Its residents, as a result, can only long to escape from that lifelong boredom.

The pleasures gaming has provided Koss are countless. In his troop, he is a leader, wise in all aspects related to Quake. In the gaming world he thrives in, he is near invincible, allowing him to travel from his town to the capital to win the nationals, paving his way to compete in California along with other anonymous gamers from around the world whose possible dull lives tempt them to do better in their artificial second lives. Those pleasures, like the artificial lives that end as soon as enough hits are absorbed, are temporary. The excitement wears off. The redundancy of real life beckons. Koss has to abandon the fantasies his dissipating childhood has left to live a life that is unadorned and ordinary. Gaamer, in demystifying that particular subculture that has successfully separated generations by exquisitely pointing out the obvious sheens and motivations of those stuck commuting to the game world from the real world, exposes the need for escapism especially from the droll experiences most of humanity is forced to swallow.

In the end, even cinema is an escape. It has to be exposed for what it is. Its portrayals of truths and half-truths should be placed in a perspective of fiction, of being created by another human being. When Koss has readied to graduate from being a gamer to become an adult, he sheds his jacket and prepares to sleep. A celebratory song plays in the background, and Koss, from being melancholic in his delayed decision to grow up, beams a smile, and looks at us. The same way that he broke the barrier that separates videogames from real life, Sentsov breaks the barrier that separates cinema from real life. By revealing the artificiality of his creative exercise, he deepens his agenda, cautioning the world from being too enchanted with second, third, and fourth lives lived vicariously through avatars that are either controlled from a mouse and keyboard or directed by intellectuals behind the camera.

(First published in Filmkrant: Slow Criticism 2012.)

Tunay na Ina (1939)








Tunay na Ina (Octavio Silos, 1939)
English Title: True Mother

History has not been kind to Philippine cinema. Due to a climate that has made film preservation a daunting endeavor and an unfortunate culture of neglect for culture, films have actual life spans of a few years before they disintegrate or be recycled into home-made trumpets. Luck, more than anything, is the primary driving force for films to last longer than they logically should. One of only a handful of extremely lucky films to survive the war and several decades of neglect is Octavio Silos’ Tunay na Ina (True Mother), a tender melodrama about Magdalena (Rosario Moreno), a mother who is in search for the daughter that was taken away from her.

A product of rape, the baby was given up by Magdalena’s father (Precioso Palma) in the hopes that she can have another chance at getting happily married with a decent man. After a few years since the baby was given to a kind woman (Naty Bernardo) who has raised her like her true daughter, Magdalena has fallen in love with Roberto (Rudy Concepcion) but is worried that the truth about her past and her missing daughter will taint their blossoming relationship. Magdalena finally decides to tell Roberto everything, confessing about the past she and her family tried so hard to hide in a letter, which Magdalena’s aunt (Nati Rubi) intercepted, thinking that the letter will only result in further heartaches.

Roberto and Magdalena eventually marry. Magdalena’s aunt reveals to Magdalena that she never gave Roberto the letter, which leads Antonio (Exequiel Segovia), Magdalena’s rapist, to extort money from Magdalena with the promise not to ruin her marriage with Roberto by revealing about their daughter. Pining for her missing daughter (Tita Duran), Magdalena, with the help of her aunt, starts to search for her and discovers that she has been blessed with a beautiful voice which she uses to beg for alms to support her ailing foster mother. Magdalena suddenly finds herself caught between her desire to be reunited with her daughter and her fear of being separated from her beloved husband.

Tunay na Ina, like many of the other Filipino films during its period wherein the popularity of the zarzuela was under the mercy of the motion picture, has its characters suddenly bursting into song to enunciate the extreme joy or sadness that they are experiencing. In one scene, Magdalena’s daughter belts out a sad tune, detailing the hardships she has to face because of her poverty. In another scene, Magdalena expresses her grief towards her father’s death through a mournful song that aptly depicts the tragedies that have befallen her ever since her daughter was given away.

Buhat (Since), perhaps one of the most famous songs from the film which was remade by Rico J. Puno in the 70’s, is sung four times in the film. The first time is during Magdalena’s first dance with Roberto, followed by their engagement. Composed by Miguel Velarde, Jr., with lyrics by Dominador Santiago, the song is an immaculate love theme, expressing the intense adoration one suddenly has upon the first time one lays his or her eyes on her lover.

The third time the theme is sung transforms the song completely. Magdalena is in the bank of a stream where her daughter’s foster mother is washing clothes. She sings the song to her daughter, and her daughter reciprocates the melodically rendered affection by going close to her, revealing what seems to be a repressed longing for her real mother through quick glances set in such beautiful melody. The delicate scene is heartbreaking, utilizing the notes and words of a romantic chorus to direct the same feeling one usually reserves for love between two people swept into ecstasy by passion towards the immense emotion a mother has for a daughter she only had the opportunity to be with at that exact moment.

The fourth time the song is sung, everything has been resolved, and everybody is happy. At that joyous moment, after all the sordid struggles the characters have to face because of the conspiracy of twisted fate and human judgment, seem to be just distant memories. In that flurry of song, happy faces, and pleasant gestures, love, whether it be between husband and wife or mother and daughter, is the only thing that matters.

Tunay na Ina may have sensibilities that are extremely outdated. The words spoken by its characters are too ornate, too flowery to be believable. The scenes are too visually unsophisticated to arouse awe. The acting is too overstated, too unsubtle to be intelligent. The plot is too simple and undemanding. However, beyond these inconsequential complaints that are only results of the technological and cultural gaps between now and then, Tunay na Ina bears something that all the complicated narratives and showy spectacles of today lacks, and that is the fluency in communicating genuine emotions.

(Cross-published in Lagarista.)